Showing posts with label Rays. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rays. Show all posts
17 November 2011
On the Cubs hiring of Dale Sveum
First of all, yes, it did take me a little bit to pronounce it right (SWAIM, not SVEE-um). My first thought was, as it will be going forward, In Theo We Trust. Sveum isn't a name that's in vogue. It's not a Valentine or a Francona. Hiring (and paying a premium) for a hot name hasn't exactly paid off nearly as much as was paid for it.
Even though it's a different sport, take a quick look at Dan Snyder's tenure as Washington Redskins owner. In 1999 he bought the team as what was then the highest price for a team in history for ALL sports. The list of big names brought in includes: Steve Spurrier, (the return of) Joe Gibbs, Brandon Lloyd, Adam Archuleta, Albert Hayneworth, Mike Shanahan and Donovan McNabb.
The bit that resounded with me during Theo's intro presser was that in free agency, they would be paying for future and not past results. Nearly every name in the above list fits in the former category. In Snyder's 13 years as an owner, the Redskins have all of 2 ten win seasons and 3 playoff appearances (2 wins). Not exactly a fine track record for success.
One last tidbit: Was Joe Maddon a "name" when Tampa's version of the Superfriends (Friedman, Silverman, Sternberg) hired him in 2006? Nope, but he sure as hell is now, winning Manager of the Year in 2008 and 2011. Am I saying I'm expecting Sveum to win 2 MotY's in 6 years? No, but again, it all goes back to what I said, In Theo We Trust.
Tags
Cubs,
Dale Sveum,
Dan Snyder,
Joe Maddon,
MLB,
Rays,
Redskins,
Theo Epstein
20 July 2011
MLB Projections
I've tweeted a little bit about this earlier this week, so here's the fruits of my labor. I've developed a little bit of Excel programming skills over the past couple years, and wanted to find a way to see how bad the Cubs can b....I mean see where the MLB season might end up at the end of the regular season. The two main components I would need are a measure of teams true ability to win games, and a predictive formula for teams given their remaining schedule.
Enter the Pythangorian Win Expectation and Log5 formulas.
For those who are currently thinking of jokes of my dorkdom, Pythagorian Win Expectation (PWE) takes a team's runs scored and runs against, and spits out an expected win percentage. It gets its name from looking somewhat like that old Pythagorian Theorem we all learned in trigonometry (a^2 + b^2 = c^2):
PWE = (R^2) / (R^2 + RA^2),
where R is runs for and RA is runs against. Further research on the subject showed that a more accurate exponent is 1.81 instead of 2. A different exponent can also be used for college basketball (somewhere between 8 and 9) and the NBA (somewhere between 14.5 and 16).
The Log5 formula comes from the Godfather of Sabermetrics, Bill James. Based on the Bayes Theorem, this formula is used to find win probability of two teams when they meet. If Team A and Team B played each other, the probability of Team A is given by
P(A) = (A - A * B) / (A + B - 2*A*B),
where A is Team A's win percentage, and B is Team B's win percentage.
So now we have an decent estimation of a team's ability to win games, and a way to estimate the probability of who will win a game between two teams. All there is left to do is throw the remainder of the MLB schedule into the hopper and see what we come up with (h/t to Daily Baseball Data for putting the entire MLB schedule in Excel format).
American League | | |
EAST | W | L |
Boston | 98.5 | 62.5 |
NY Yankees | 96.1 | 62.9 |
Tampa Bay | 84.8 | 76.2 |
Toronto | 81.4 | 81.6 |
Balimore | 63.4 | 96.6 |
CENTRAL | | |
Detroit | 84.5 | 77.5 |
Cleveland | 84.3 | 77.7 |
Chicago Sox | 79.3 | 82.7 |
Minnesota | 72.6 | 88.4 |
Kansas City | 67.1 | 94.9 |
WEST | | |
Texas | 93.5 | 69.5 |
LA Angels | 82.0 | 81.0 |
Oakland | 72.0 | 91.0 |
Seattle | 70.5 | 90.5 |
National League | | |
EAST | | |
Philadelphia | 100.6 | 62.4 |
Atlanta | 94.1 | 68.9 |
NY Mets | 81.3 | 81.7 |
Washington | 79.3 | 83.7 |
Florida | 75.7 | 87.3 |
CENTRAL | | |
Pittsburgh | 85.2 | 75.8 |
St. Louis | 85.7 | 77.3 |
Milwaukee | 84.2 | 77.8 |
Cincinnati | 83.4 | 79.6 |
Chicago Cubs | 64.4 | 98.6 |
Houston | 57.3 | 105.7 |
WEST | | |
San Francisco | 91.1 | 71.9 |
Arizona | 85.7 | 77.3 |
Colorado | 79.7 | 83.3 |
San Diego | 71.7 | 91.3 |
LA Dodgers | 70.7 | 91.3 |
I do give my apologies, because this table was made in the middle of a day of games. I don't have time to wait until midnight for all the games to be over, nor the time in the morning to get it done before the early afternoon games start. This also skews the run totals a bit, but not a whole lot for our analysis.
In a showing of how the futile the Cubs are this year, the first thing I noticed was that they are, on average, not headed for a 100-loss season. Around the league, here now are the storylines I will be looking for the rest of the season:
- The reigning pennant winners, the Rangers and the Giants, will run away with their respective divisions.
- The AL East will once again take two playoff spots, leaving Detroit and Cleveland fighting for one spot while Boston, New York and Tampa fight for two spots
- With the East Coast Bias of the media, the watch will be on to see if the Phillies will win 100 games for the first time since 1977
- The exciting 4-team race for the NL Central, which includes the Pirates quest for their first winning season since Barry Bonds was skinny (1992).
Tags
Bill James,
Cubs,
East Coast Bias,
Giants,
Indians,
MLB,
NL Central,
Phillies,
Pirates,
Rangers,
Rays,
Red Sox,
sabermetrics,
Tigers,
Yankees
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)